Pyramids and palm trees or pyramids and pharaohs?: Adaptation and validation of semantic association test to the spanish.
| Autores | Martinez Cuitiño M, Barreyro JP. |
|---|---|
| Año | 2010 |
| Journal | Martinez Cuitiño M, Barreyro JP. |
| Volumen | 27(2): 247-260 |
| Abstract | Semantic memory is a long term memory system proposed by Tulving (2000) that stores objects, words, and general world knowledge’s meanings without connection with any particular time or place. Conceptual knowledge is mostly shared across individuals in a given culture, although its precise scope depends on the individual’s experience (Hodges & Patterson,1997; Patterson & Hodges, 1995). Semantic memory may be impaired in many neurological disorders. This disruption may be attributed to pathology in the infer-lateral temporal lobes. Patients with semantic dementia have difficulties with objects and words meanings (Budson & Price, 2005). Pyramids and Palm Trees Test is one of the most used measures to assess acquired semantic impairments (Howard & Patterson, 1992). It’s a semantic association test and has six different administration modalities: pictorial, verbal, and combined. This test contains 52 triads. The English normative data from the original Pyramids and Palm Trees Test Manual (Howard & Patterson, 1992) was only obtained in13 young adults, and no participant made morethan three errors. This is a socio-cultural influenced test. The aims of this article are to present the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test adaptation and validation to our language (Spanish) and cultural context, to compare the 52 triads from the original version with a new and shorter 20 triads version, to assess differences in performance between controls and patients in both tests, and to get cutoff scores on both versions. A computerized version of the original test (52 triads) plus 14 new triads (66 triads in total) were administered to 50 volunteers (40 controls and 10 semantic dementia patients). Presentation program was used to present the stimulus. Non frequent cultural associations were omitted: (a) windmill, tulip-daffodil, (b) carrot, lamb-donkey, (c) acorns, donkey-pig, and (d) Eskimo-rowing, boat-kayak. Also, others triads were slightly modified: (a) caterpillar, butterfly-dragonfly by caterpillar, butterfly-ant, (b) Eskimo, igloo-house by Indian, carp-house, (c) crook, sheep-mice by dog, rabbit-mice, (d) padlock, bicycle-car by pump, bicycle- car, (e) blackboard, table-desk by blackboard, pen-chalk, (f) eggs, hen-swan by flock, hen-duck, and (g) soldier, church-castle by knight, church-castle. Triads with composed words in Spanish were changed: (a) safety pin (alfiler de gancho), girl-baby by pacifier, girl-baby, (b) safe (caja fuerte),necklace-tie by jacket (chaleco), necklace-tie, and (c) bath, owl-woodpecker (pájaro carpintero) by bath, owl-canary. Of the 66 adapted triads, the 20 that allowed better discrimination between patients and controls were selected. The new and shorter version is called Pyramids and Pharaohs, because the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test triad had low specificity and moderate sensitivity in our sample and wasn´t selected. In the adapted Pyramids and Palm Trees Test the reliability index of the pictorial version was moderately high (α = .857), and high for the verbal modality (α = .910). In the Pyramids and Pharaohs Test the reliability index was high for both versions (pictorial: α = .917; verbal: α = .918). The cutoff score for the original version was 44 for the pictorial modality and 43 for the verbal modality. In the Pyramids and Pharaohs Test the cutoff score was 17 for the pictorial modality and 18 for the verbal one. Regarding the specificity, the adapted Pyramids and Palm Trees Test was high (98.8%) same as the new shorter test. In relation to the sensitivity, the original test was moderate (70%), lower than the Pyramids and Pharaohs Test (85%). Results indicate that the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test can be considered an appropriate adaptation to our social culture. Moreover a new test was designed, Pyramids and Pharaohs, with only 20 triads, adequate for semantics acquired impairments assessment, useful for the research on cognitive processes and current clinical requirements. |
| Otra información |